A report of fight and Holiday 2010
Anke Wendrich In addition to the moderator Ralf Hron of DGB were three men: Jens Hoff Sommer (Green), Dr. Peter Lames (SPD) and Andre Scholl Bach (LINKE.).
Christa Müller (CDU) and Franz-Josef Fischer had not come. What became of the men, of course, heavily criticized. I remember the round from last year - as were Miller and the representatives of the citizens group "worked" verbally violent ... Na and Holger Zastrow of the FDP is clearly not always desirable (the AG Liberal workers, however, had their status).
course (unfortunately) I was clear beforehand that it would go populist. But was exciting for me, would fit what subjects, who by the Cocoa drawn. I peck out a lot:
Peter Lames (SPD) complained that the city would have enough money for school renovations, but there was enough money to buy back DREWAG by lush credit. If the SPD does not support the project DREWAG clear - why do you play now as the one against the other?
on next Thursday in the City Council the issue of social ticket is treated. While I in vain for info on the Palace Square footage was looking for - I was referred to the standing on the promotional postcard Internet address - Schollbach complained about the unreliable fickle citizens group. After all that is necessary to get a city council majority either way.
Hoff Sommer criticized that the city had no concept of living in poverty in old age. The OB wipe away the subject. Yes, yes - the WOBA sales had to be mentioned here, of course. Demographic considerations emerged the first place.
was very bad of course, in recent weeks, the mudslinging by consortium leader Bachmann, was sparked by the OB and BM Seidel. Scholl Bach. At the end of the criticisms had nothing left and there was the golden handshake for Bachmann. Since I know the consortium from the inside, I notice but with significant shortcomings in the work. Na and the mud was my impression rather Schollbach from than Seidel. Finally, BM Seidel does not support the party in his choice ..
background of the whole debate are reflections of the Government, the option model to support the introduction of long-term unemployed - so Lames. A completely new interpretation.
The leftists can not handle money? Nonsense, said Scholl Bach. You do look just as at the federal and state level, the CDU and the Liberals deal with the money ....
He was asked where he would save the city from the scarce resources. Aaaalso - we would spend more money on schools, social ticket, rehabilitation of sports facilities. Na and save? With oversized Transport projects. Point. More's was not heard.
For Lames could be heard even after all that one could save the Chamber conversion. Whether the total impact of the financial problems of the city essentially positive ????? Na and the preservation of the multi cultural palace is determined also cheaper than the agreed solution. He said. As opposed Hoff summer. What needs to change
in the city? Well the OB needs to communicate better. The OB is demonstrated by the professional mayors (there were no differences). They would all vote only in the CDU group, before the City Council will be switched on, Lames. Na would have on citizens and the Office of the OB presented their visions for Dresden, Dresden's place to let their voice. As far as I know, used the opportunity to Dresden over two hours, the event went much longer than planned.
My expectations were fully met.
I still shake my head and think how stupid these politicians (especially Lames and Schollbach) viewers that they do not notice the populism. Fortunately there were not many - in the theater space - and the kennel was more going on.
0 comments:
Post a Comment