Ball Gowns Under 150$

house recycling or as a ruin is to be marketed new

is very funny to see that completely how resistant some home sellers of the reality. The cheapest refurbished half-timbered house, which we had bought - after the identification of any flaws - but by avoidance of the contract for fraudulent misrepresentation to the Fortunately, again got rid of (for details see here ) is back on the market ... namely, because ( here and then the Scout-ID enter 49,600,285).

In Immobilienscout the shack but is actually re-presented as " TOP Historical property with spa and sauna . Ridiculous. We have received a report that attests to this house to be uninhabitable. During the renovation that is crucial mistakes were made in the planning. The historical foundations were poorly from the outside and partly not against the invading water (slope side in particular) is sealed. The restoration plaster applied on the inside makes the water virtually unimpeded in the cellar, but also enter the house itself. Good climate for a potato cellar - but not for the so-called "spa in the basement." In such a sauna and pool area very moist air is generated by the ingress of moisture from the outside can be reinforced and barely pull off. Except just in the rest house - the spa is still separated from the rest by any door to open plan house.

Very interesting is the fact that the published Expose no mention of the dramatic damage. Since the sellers want're not fooled again a potential buyer fraudulently? The broker (incidentally another than with our purchase) has certainly secured apparently "all in this offer contained information, dimensions and prices are based on information from the seller or a third party, the broker takes For this purpose any detention."

Well, in prison, he must have not the same, but by calling on our part was the broker on the inglorious Vergangeinheit informed of the object. He knows about the predamages decision on and information is a potential buyer commits. Since this clause also helps nothing more. We (covered of course) will spend our time as a buyer and the check ;-)

In any case, it be our pleasure to inform potential buyers about the object.

We may be resentful? Um, yes, we have as a result of the machinations of the seller put a lot of money in the sand ... there must be a little malice be allowed.

Best Electrolyte For Zinc Plating?

Legal (8) - "The wet house" (Source: http://www.ra-sawal.de)

The website http://www.ra-sawal.de a very interesting article on the subject by deception in relation to the sale of Fechtigkeitsschäden recently renovated / refurbished buildings ( link):

"Who wants to sell his house, the prospects also like to point without being asked to moisture damage. This was the ruling of the Saarland Higher Regional Court recently.

expect true should buyers of older buildings with some degree of moisture, but not to the extreme moisture of the basement walls . That is all right if the Basement walls due shortly before completion of renovation works appear as a dry impression and not the seller to carry out the renovation and the reason the prospective buyer, despite the knowledge gap communicates. (Ruling of the Court)

In the opinion of the underlying case, the buyer had found a house shortly after the acquisition extreme humidity in the basement. He then challenged the contract for fraudulent misrepresentation. The vendor resisted, arguing that he was not asked to moisture damage in the run - the buyer is thus "own fault". This view did not share the Court of Appeals. Moisture in the basement was so crucial in the buying decision, that the seller also had the opportunity to comment without being asked. The buyer

reached the rescission of the contract. The seller is in such a practice usually also a significant risk of damage.

OLG Saarbrücken from 5.8.2008, 90/08 4 U - 33 "

Source: http://www.ra-sawal.de/Wordpress/?p=286