How Get Rid Metallic Taste

Press Search Teil10

Once again, the subject of insolvency of a company treated from the IMAC group in the press. In a recent article ( Link ) writes the voice from Heilbronn ( www.stimme.de ) under the heading: "Subject customers feel betrayed."

called The text: "You feel all cheated, tenants as well as homeowners The company name is driving on many of the Zornesröte face insist on the repayment of their deposits.. some, their rental demand the other. The prosecutor is investigating Stuttgart manager Matthias HEISSNER for embezzlement, fraud and Insolvenzverschleppung (reported Heilbronner Stimme). The former property manager based in Leonberg, based on requests from the Newspapers not responding, many objects had been maintaining in the region, the rent passed to the owners, manages the costs. "

writes about the fate of individual topic-customer The author Petra Halamoda continued: " S orge deposits due a rude awakening came for the elderly assisted living in the lake road 38/40 in Heilbronn-Böckingen, when the city water works announced lock. Basic: 11 000 € from the issue of standing. "They wanted us all turn in all seriousness and a water truck Introducing the door. "Sabine send the Diakonia shakes his head. "A lady has got almost the heart Kasper. . Fortunately, her daughter was there, "Ataman Turanli, Managing Director of Supply GmbH Heilbronner, admits:" This situation was a hardship. As we try everything before the water is shut off. We have endured long. Around a half years was not paid. "Diakonia shot before the money.

Another concern is the whereabouts of the deposits. The administration had put the company on a collection account set up in mid-2007 everything possible had been used on-administrator Holger Leichtle said. EUR 500 000 have disappeared.

Perplexed makes the residents of North Road 2 in Neckarsulm Teilort Obereisesheim. "I do not know what's coming," says Maria Dukart in broken German. "If the money is gone. That's not right," your neighbor, whose two children between the legs sticking out, adding: "The majority thinks the money is lost. But our landlord is a decent man. Maybe we'll get from him the 1200 €. "The amount the deep holes rips into the budget. Andreas Gastgeb mayor: "In this area, public housing are foreign citizens in the majority. A clientele that it is financially not rosy. "

had also assisted living in Böckingen not trust no one practice with the collective account. "These are old people. They do what they are told, "said Supervisor Sabine Chic. "I think that's all flutes. This makes the people to create insane. Nobody here is rich. Many need the money urgently, if they move out. " Margaret Betz (81) is angry. "The fact that the guys are not ashamed, to rob the poor. Those are character rags. "The charges were in error. 700 € fees they should pay properly were 100 €.

The man, who must untangle the mess, is the new manager Hans-Juergen Heald. For 20 years in business, the Untereisesheim "never experienced such a thing." Of the subject he has taken over houses, which for months has been no building insurance paid. Imagine the consequences if a fire had broken out. Because he "was real pressure" and threatened with criminal charges, he could the advances achieved, a total of 20 000 euros.

to some good-natured owner associations he had first to draw attention to the plight. "People are so kind in the area and can be put off," said Heald is the fact that only made a few Rabatz. Also, shame plays a role. "In addition, the all-inclusive package, with which the objects were advertised, initially went well. The owners had a guarantee for the payments, the ancient inhabitants do not usually. "Ziegler is the owner of Gertrude from other woods. "One year I have not seen any rent which received its company," says the Obereisesheim Erin. "I am the boss e-mails have bombed." Three processes they won against the theme, 8000 € to their posts. That gives her nothing. "The verdict could not be completed."

Something Wrong With My Dogs Mouth

Press Research Part 9

In a recent article attacks the Heilbronner Stimme the event and IMAC HEISSNER titled "Investor in the sights of prosecutors' . again

It reads in part: "Now Is the Leonberger, whose real estate Imac GmbH specializes in the restoration of listed buildings, apparently up to their necks in trouble . For months, the prosecution determined Stuttgart against him. for embezzlement, fraud and Insolvenzverschleppung . In three raids, including former private home in hot and two of his companies, the Imac and the subject, investigators confiscated boxes of folders. The public prosecutor confirmed on demand. The charge of Insolvenzverschleppung concerns about the company, which forwarded the rent for flats to their owners. They managed the objects of the Imac. In February 2007, had begun an investigation here, a spokeswoman for the Stuttgart prosecutors. " the beginning everything seemed relatively small, it took an ever greater scale. ""

Next the paper said..
" deposits

disappeared in weddings employed about 40 men" now works there, no one has gone dead, the company, "said Holger Leichtle The lawyer is now appointed as liquidator. Since late July, the insolvency proceedings are opened now remains to consider "whether enough mass is present, to pay court and administration" He says:... "There is nothing tangible there anymore" Just give claims it " Correct. accounts existed at the firm about not. Deposits of tenants came to a collective account, the mid-2007 Available for all used. "500 000 euro was had disappeared on security deposits.

Overall, he appraised the damage at "up to five million euros" . At the end of October, the lawyer has terminated all leases between the topic. Around 2000 he has written to creditors. The insolvency predicted: "HEISSNER liable only to the installments. He will not have to pay for this disaster, "the iMac is not affected by the matter."

to our case, writes the voice. "Matthias HEISSNER however, is also in trouble in the house renovations. Mr. and Mrs. Brandt, Freiberg am Neckar in the district of Ludwigsburg HEISSNER a property for 230 000 €'ve bought, an appraiser certifies that the improper "cheap" remediation of the old building had led to moisture damage. to eliminate this would cost around 100 000 €. The apartment terminated a deposit for the house uninhabitable, a dispute in view and looking for accommodation for which rent is payable in parallel: "This brings one to the limits," said Holger Brandt. "HEISSNER designated as the kids stuff that interested him not long ago." There is not a representation by the Imac is, hot former position. "Since he is no longer available to us."

conclusion: .. "Compared with the press raises the Imac smoke grenades responded to many inquiries to our newspaper is no longer an employee HEISSNER announced in Wimpfen the developers have changed the BW monument project mbH has jurisdiction only. The company is running at the same address . like the Imac Their manager once gave lectures on the landlord protection index - a further HEISSNER project calls are also pointless..

Source: www.stimme.de

Mico Metal Coew Wheels

Legal (3) - liable for concealed defects

Source: www.ra-

heinicke.de about www.baurechtsurteile.de

" OLG Koblenz, decision of 09.02.2006, 5 U 1111/05

In the present case the plaintiff by the defendant had acquired a house. The contract was a warranty exclusion agreed. It turned out later that the basement walls were wet . was detected Due expert opinion, that this was due to poor sealing and the seller must have been known. The buyer is relying on the warranty and that he had told the buyer prior to signing the purchase contract, that this is an old Keller would act.

The OLG said the buyer of the clean-up costs to. Cause of action was for damages due to fraudulent concealment of a defect. In view of this, then the disclaimer is also not effective. Because of fraudulently concealed defects liability could not be excluded. There were a revelation subject to shortages. Deception of the seller is not a prerequisite for the claim. It is sufficient that the seller was aware or errors that he was at least possible and was tacitly accepted in that the buyer has not recognized this shortcoming would have to recognize, however, may not complete the purchase agreement. But the evidence that this is an old cellar, be for the information is not sufficient, but rather played down. The lack of outer sealing place but still represents a significant deficiency, as is likely with recurrent severe moisture damage "

Skin Flaking Off Scrotum

Legal (2) - reversal of a real estate purchase agreement at low defects possible

source.
lawyer Simone Scholz
Firnhaberstraße 5a
70174 Stuttgart
www.rechtsanwaltsofort.de

about www.baurechtsurteile.de

"A ruling by the Federal Court of 24 March 2006, a real estate buyer in the event of fraud now because of minor defects to cancel the purchase contract.

principle is a withdrawal from the contract due to defects of the property only be considered if the defect is negligible. After the decision, the withdrawal is now possible even with a minor defect. "Namely, if the seller has fraudulently misled about this lack," explains the lawyer Simone Scholz from Stuttgart.

In the case decided by the Supreme Court, the buyer had a property at a price of € 85,000 purchased with the exclusion of liability for defects. After handing over the apartment provided the buyer discovers a moisture damage that would cost its disposal 2,500 euros. The seller was this Moisture damage before purchase contract known. The buyer asked the seller to rectify the defect. After the seller refused, the buyer came back from the contract.

District Court and Court of Appeal dismissed the Oldenburg in order to recover the purchase price. In support led to the courts that it is in terms of low defect cost of 2,500 € is merely a serious deficiency, trade and the interests of the seller on the continued existence of the Agreement will prevail, finally, that the seller in the event of a reversal not only the purchase price, but also report the notary fees, land costs and loan costs.

Takes The court however took the view that the case be important that the seller of the damage prior to signing the purchase agreement was announced and he does have the buyer fraudulently concealed. In a fraud by the seller, he must pay for dealing with minor defects and to accept the rescission of the contract with its serious consequences. The Supreme Court based its legal opinion so that the confidence of the seller in the stock purchase agreement of the do not deserve protection if he had come by a fraudulent misrepresentation about. "